Weapon?
Cops plead not guilty in Miron records breach case
By Daniel Tepfer
Staff writer
Updated: 07/08/2009 02:00:04 PM EDT
BRIDGEPORT — More than two dozen police officers from around the state packed a Golden Hill Street courtroom this morning to support two Stratford officers accused of illegally accessing the town’s computer system and releasing personnel data for Mayor James Miron’s brother, who had applied to be a police officer.
The two officers, who have been placed on unpaid leave by Stratford police officials, were charged June 24 for disseminating confidential information from the police job application by Christian Miron, the mayor’s younger brother. The arrest was made by inspectors from the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney following an investigation requested by Chief John J. Buturla.
The two officers, Lt. Joseph McNeil and Lt. Orlando Soto, pleaded not guilty to multiple counts of third-degree computer crime and conspiracy to commit third-degree computer crime. They elected to have jury trials. Superior Court Judge Maria Kahn continued Soto’s case to Aug. 6 and McNeil’s to Aug. 27.
The case against a third defendant, former police Sgt. Shawn Farmer, who faces the same charges, has been continued without plea to July 22. Farmer left the department shortly after controversy erupted over the Miron records breach.
It took the crowd of police officers longer to file out of the courtroom than the brief courtroom hearing.
Supervisory Assistant State’s Attorney John Malone declined comment on the case.
Outside the courthouse, lawyers for Soto and O’Neil and the Stratford police union blasted Mayor Miron for what they described as a “vindictive campaign” against the officers, who had been active in the town’s police union.
“There is no question this arrest was politically motivated,” said O’Neil’s lawyer, Charles Tiernan. “Mr. McNeil had the right to access the records, he did not do anything wrong and when all the information comes out it will show no crime was committed here.”
Soto’s lawyer William Dow pointed out that his client was exonerated of any wrongdoing in the case by the town’s internal investigation of the incident. “We are confident that when the entire record is examined he will be exonerated in this court,” he said.
“This mayor has been constantly hammering this union,” said Richard Gudis, the police union lawyer. “There is a plethora of facts here that when they come out these officers will be exonerated.”
The mayor’s brother, Christian Miron, 30, had applied to be a Stratford police officer. Sometime in March 2008, while the application process was still ongoing, several members of the Stratford Town Council were anonymously mailed copies of Miron’s background information that they apparently believed showed that he was not qualified to be a police officer.
Miron, however, was given a conditional offer of employment as a police officer, but was not among the officers hired last July.
According to the arrest warrant affidavit, a subsequent investigation by then-Deputy Chief Joseph LoSchiavo and Capt. John Popik determined that McNeil, then a captain, Soto and Farmer had accessed the Police Department’s locked computer system, and that McNeil and Soto used the department’s printer to make copies of Miron’s background report.
Christian Miron has filed a defamation lawsuit against the Stratford police union, current and former union leaders, and Town Council Chairman Michael Henrick, R-10, over what he contends was the improper release of his personnel records.
Today Shawn Farmer (former Local 407 President), Lt. Orlando Soto (Detective Bureau) and Captain Joe McNeil (President of Local 407) surrendered at Troop G pursuant to an arrest warrant. The Crime?
GENERAL STATUTES OF CONNECTICUT
TITLE 53A. PENAL CODE
CHAPTER 952. PENAL CODE: OFFENSES
PART XXII. COMPUTER-RELATED OFFENSES
Conn. Gen. Stat. @ 53a-250 (1989)
GENERAL STATUTES OF CONNECTICUT
TITLE 53A. PENAL CODE
CHAPTER 952. PENAL CODE: OFFENSES
PART XXII. COMPUTER-RELATED OFFENSES
Conn. Gen. Stat. @ 53a-251 (1989)
Sec. 53a-251. Computer crime.
(a) Defined. A person commits computer crime when he violates any of the provisions of this section.
(b) Unauthorized access to a computer system. (1) A person is guilty of the computer crime of unauthorized access to a computer system when, knowing that he is not authorized to do so, he accesses or causes to be accessed any computer system without authorization.
(2) It shall be an affirmative defense to a prosecution for unauthorized access to a computer system that: (A) The person
reasonably believed that the owner of the computer system, or a person empowered to license access thereto, had authorized him to access; (B) the person reasonably believed that the owner of the computer system, or a person empowered to license access thereto, would have authorized him to access without payment of any consideration; or (C) the person reasonably could not have known that his access was unauthorized.
(c) Theft of computer services. A person is guilty of the computer crime of theft of computer services when he accesses or
causes to be accessed or otherwise uses or causes to be used a computer system with the intent to obtain unauthorized computer services.
(d) Interruption of computer services. A person is guilty of the computer crime of interruption of computer services when he,
without authorization, intentionally or recklessly disrupts or degrades or causes the disruption or degradation of computer
services or denies or causes the denial of computer services to an authorized user of a computer system.
(e) Misuse of computer system information. A person is guilty of the computer crime of misuse of computer system information when: (1) As a result of his accessing or causing to be accessed a computer system, he intentionally makes or causes to be made an unauthorized display, use, disclosure or copy, in any form, of data residing in, communicated by or produced by a computer system; or (2) he intentionally or recklessly and without authorization (A) alters, deletes, tampers with, damages, destroys or takes data intended for use by a computer system, whether residing within or external to a computer system, or (B) intercepts or adds data to data residing within a computer system; or (3) he knowingly receives or retains data obtained in violation of subdivision (1) or (2) of this subsection; or (4) he uses or discloses any data he knows or believes was obtained in violation of subdivision (1) or (2) of this subsection.
(f) Destruction of computer equipment. A person is guilty of the computer crime of destruction of computer equipment when he, without authorization, intentionally or recklessly tampers with, takes, transfers, conceals, alters, damages or destroys any
equipment used in a computer system or intentionally or recklessly causes any of the foregoing to occur.
Before the next shoe drops, which will be the suspension of Joe McNeil (Again. And for the same thing) and Lt. Soto, let us all remember that Richard Miron was arrested and charged with 89 counts of first degree larceny. Mayor Moron let him serve out his term as Registrar of Voters without missing 1 day of pay claiming that he was “innocent until proven guilty”.
The persecution of members of Local 407 continues….
Filed under: Stratford Political Theater | 50 Comments
-
Citizens
jezebel282 on High Notes jezebel282 on George’s Page 1george1 on High Notes 1george1 on High Notes jezebel282 on High Notes phineast on High Notes 1george1 on High Notes phineast on High Notes jezebel282 on High Notes phineast on High Notes jezebel282 on High Notes jezebel282 on High Notes jezebel282 on High Notes phineast on High Notes 1george1 on High Notes
I guess our esteemed mayor…
… sorry, I just threw up a little in my mouth…
…needs to get his shots in now. Lord knows he’ll be a wanted man on November 4th!!! If he as musch as steps off a curb he’ll find himself hauled down to the klink for jaywalking.
Good thing he’s a lawyer… he could set a U.S. record for the number of times he is going to get arrested!!!
Just when you think it couldn’t get any worse….
Who would be foolish enough to think that while Miron is still mayor???
The mayor has reached a new low.
The Mayor will say he has nothing to do with this. This is a police matter.
Don’t worry Ron… he’s got a good 4+ months to reach an even lower low!!!
(I’ll set the under/over at a month… tops!!!)
And yet, Justin Loschiavo is still a police officer., He is still on “injured” status 18 days later.
HEY MIKE…
Wanna buy some land in Florida??? I’ve got a GREAT deal to make ya!!!
If I cahnge my name to Sudds Loschiavo do you think I can get a job on the police force???
I’ll only need it for ONE* day!!!
* that should be plenty of time to get a disability claim in.
Come on Sudds…You know that’s what he’ll say. He’s going to deflect any responsibility to someone else.
Suds,
He can do alot of dammage and hurt alot of people in 4 1\2 months.
After reading the statute, it looks like their proceeding based on:
(e) Misuse of computer system information. A person is guilty of the computer crime of misuse of computer system information when: (1) As a result of his accessing or causing to be accessed a computer system, he intentionally makes or causes to be made an unauthorized display, use, disclosure or copy, in any form, of data residing in, communicated by or produced by a computer system
Good luck boys.
(2) It shall be an affirmative defense to a prosecution for
unauthorized access to a computer system that: (A) The person
reasonably believed that the owner of the computer system, or a
person empowered to license access thereto, had authorized him to
access; (B) the person reasonably believed that the owner of the
computer system, or a person empowered to license access thereto,
would have authorized him to access without payment of any
consideration; or (C) the person reasonably could not have known
that his access was unauthorized.
I agree with that Jez.
Which causes me to question why the warrant was signed off on in the first place.
The State is going to have to prove that the defendant’s affirmative defensive is not valid. Good luck on that.
Mike,
Unless it is just another attempt by Mayor Moron to keep slapping at Local 407 by reaching into the McNeil family checking account because his brother wasn’t qualified.
You don’t even have to wait for the paper to come out to hear that Buturla will suspend them.
Time is always on the side of those who get paychecks.
Mike, they have been trying for very long time to get a warrant signed and no one would sign it, so they took it to Rocky Hill and in my humble opinion did a snow job and a half or called in mucho favors. This is actually going to be the demise of Stratford dem party(which at this point looks like a good thing)-with the mayor and the People that supported him up in flames of shame on the way to the correctional facility for their own checkin- the mayor is arrogant enough to believe that he has done no wrong…but a little research has proven otherwise. He also will be ultimately facing the same fate that he has put upon officers that were trying to protect the town when the admin. would be just as happy if someone were killed by their actions–just means more litigation time don’tchaknow.
One last thought, I want to know why the chief and deputy weren’t named in the warrants as well. As supervisors and ultimately being in charge of the security of the data-it seems to me that they willfully and knowingly allowed an unsecure situation to occur and continue as part of regular police business. Seems to me that there better be a couple of more conspiracy warrants on the way…they are just as culpable if not more so as they are/were totally in charge of the security operations of the department and defining of policy-in other words their lack of action made the accessibility part of daily routine-especially since it went on for YEARS.
If they shopped that warrant around that’s disgusting.
The problem is that if only bloggers know about that then there is no public outrage.
If the CT Post latches onto that story then it will get mileage and further damage Miron. (if that’s really possible?)
The CT. POST and Stratford Star post how to send a
letter to the editor.
As previously posted, what Miron’s crew did to Jeze’s
friends, their allies did to me and my coworkers, but
with VERY SEVERE HARASSMENT.
As previously posted, Reprisals and the Color of the Law
appear to be used against Jeze’s friends, as they did to
me when I filed a complaint to Barnhart about Mossman.
-
They have a need to cause it to appear the victims were
deserving of being arrested / disciplined and the defendants
were reacting to being arrested of disciplined rather than
doing the right thing for the right reasons.
-
Loschiavo & Barnhart testified against me.
Dickie & Schirillo were in the on deck box.
Esq. Burturla’s firm handled the Mossman defense.
Everyone is involved in the Democratic Party.
Barnhart was hired by Fairfield Democrats.
-
Jeze, is it a jewish saying,
the enemy of mine enemy, is my friend?
-
Only problem, CERTAIN REPUBLICANS are as BAD or WORSE,
or maybe I should call them … pending codefendants?
-
I am well past wanting revenge.
Unnecessary and the wrong enemies.
These people are fronts and straw men.
I see a time everyone may need each other.
Yet I have been wrong before.
Mike the above is not “about me” but it goes to
pattern, modus operendi, animus, timing, disparate treatment,
position, mens rhea, facts, circumstances, personality.
If similar things happened to me, I can relate to them.
If I never saw it before, I would thing all these people are insane..;)
George,
“Jeze, is it a jewish saying, the enemy of mine enemy, is my friend?”
No. That’s Arabic.
I am not the final authority there. However, anyone who has ever spent time in New York is familiar with the term ” Petseleh Putz”. Literal: small penised dickhead.
If you are someone of Sudds’ lineage “Dupek” would work just as well.
What’s a “Dupek”???
PS… my lineage? I’m a mutt!!!
Sudds,
“PS… my lineage?”
You had claimed Polish in previous posts.
“What’s a “Dupek”???”
Look it up.
I’m a partial Pollack… but not more than 25%.
Now here is a coincidence:
All three arrest warrants were signed 3 days after after Miron/Buturla/et al were apportioned as defendants in Christian Miron’s lawsuit.
When did John Benedict retire?
He announced his retirement earlier this week. Not sure when it becomes official.
Jeze,
Thanks for the FYI on the quote,.
Dumb me – I could have googled, probably.
Me guess me am dupek too ?
At least it not dOPEC (groan for the bad pun from the anti-conspiracy)
Benedict was one of the mossman helpers in my criminal case for
disorderly conduct.
I have been at war with Michael Daly of CT. POST for months, so never
expect me to be published there again…..
Benedict, Kennedy, Harry, Ma??? other will make it to my website and
may witches like chatigney, kari dooley, droney, twardy, o’conner all
get that unconfortable feeling that their political deeds are outed.
I wish them a long life …
and eternity in HELL.
Like Mossman’s decisions, if those people had integruty and did their
jobs as fudiciarily mandated, some people might be alive today OR
have lived several year longer…
Jeze .. what is yiddish for F*** them!?
wikipedia:
The phrase the enemy of my enemy is my friend is usually
considered a foreign policy doctrine that is commonly used
to confront a significant enemy through an intermediary
in order to undermine the enemy and in a “cold” manner,
as opposed to a “hot”, direct confrontation.
It is an ancient proverb that means that solely because two
parties have a common enemy, they are friends.
Often described as an Arabic proverb, there is also an
identical Chinese proverb[1] which may be an extension
of another Chinese proverb that says,
“It is good to strike the serpent’s head with your enemy’s hand.”
A historical example of this policy occurred when the Greeks
were attacked by the Persians at Thermopylae; the Greek
city-states put aside their differences and fought the common
enemy.
Other historical examples include Christendom uniting against
the Muslim conquests, the Muslim world uniting against the C
rusades, or the Allies of World War II uniting against the Axis powers.
George,
“Jeze .. what is yiddish for F*** them!?”
Believe it or not it is the same in Denmark, Germany, Holland, Spain, Israel and France.
“F**K” seems to be universal.
For those that would like to follow these cases, arraignment is on July 8th.
http://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetail.aspx?source=Pending&Key=7eb6bb9e-0612-4346-b4b3-cfb53ec05b4f
http://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetail.aspx?source=Pending&Key=d999bfcc-70b5-4897-9430-d8a2aba31845
http://www.jud2.ct.gov/crdockets/CaseDetail.aspx?source=Pending&Key=715554e8-8d87-41f2-bd61-0eaa254ab43a
LOL… and this wasn’t even me…
http://www.topix.com/album/detail/stratford-ct/RN92T8M1HK06ESHP
Update:
(Please do not eat before reading)
Can you spell R-E-V-E-N-G-E?
The State Attorney wrote the arrest warrant for Mcneil, Soto and Farmer was Richard Walsh, who used to work under John Kelly (who consulted with Tolemeo on the private investigation we paid for) who is friends with….John Buturla.
And guess what? It gets better! Walsh retired the Friday after the warrant was served. His last warrant for a friend, John Buturla. You remember John Buturla, don’t you? Chief of Police? Who denied knowing about it even though he was the complainant.
C’mon, you remember John? He’s the guy who’s been sitting on Loschiavo’s accident report since the 22nd.
Not yet? John BUTURLA? Rich BUTURLA’s, the Town Attorney, brother? The one who works at the pleasure of Jim Miron? You know, the guy whom 92% of the department has no confidence in?
I KNEW you’d remember!
I met Joe McNeil a couple of times.
He seems to be a good guy.
I wish he and the others well and hope they are NOT GUILTY
and INNOCENT. I respect most of Stratford’s Police force.
I do not know the other defendants.
Update:
Since their arrest on June 24th, Captain McNeil and Lt Soto have been suspended without pay and have had their health insurance terminated. What happened to “innocent until proven guilty”?
Justin Loschiavo has been out on “injured on duty” since June 6th at full pay. These “injuries” were sustained in an automobile accident that had NO reported injuries.
Richard Miron was arrested and charged with DOZENS of counts of first degree larceny in May of 2008 and continued to receive full pay and benefits until December 12th 2008.
In the meantime, morale at the PD sinks lower and lower. One (count ‘em, 1) narcotics search warrant has been issued in the last 18 months. Yet the officer in charge of that department is averaging 10 hours of overtime per week with a town provided car.
This is a thoroughly disgusting situation for which there is no explanation other than….Jim Miron.
Why not send the above as a letter to the Editor?
It is under 250 words of both the Post and Star.
There are many people who know and agree.
There are a lot of people who do NOT know… and
Ever consider taking the list of the Town Committee members
and listing who they are related to, or work for, or have people
who work for the Town / BoE / State or contractor – Utility?
George,
The Star would never print it and the Post would be accused of “piling on”.
It is just as important for McNeil, Soto and the other good cops to know that no one has forgotten about them.
Give a thumbs up to one next time you see one. (Except for the guy with lots of starch in his shirts, gold scrambled eggs on his cap and glasses).
Gotta agree with George on this one-it needs to be sent in to not only the papers but how about channel 8-you can depend on them…isn’t that their motto?
Jeze –
You and the others make a big deal about supporting McNeil
and the gentleman whose pay was delayed.
He would not provide me with documented proof about his
situation – so I could NOT go on a limb on something I could
not prove.
I think McNeil is a decent guy and if he did what they claim
he did – then the LoSciavo situation is extremely helpful to
mitigate any acts.
Also – he may be completely innocent?
All of the police on here and all the Republicans and
Democrats on here ought to be ashamed for not coming
to the aid of an honest cop – if they know it.
KANE
CYCLOPS
STAR
MIKE R
PCS
ONTARGET
FOS
PHINEAST
Nnan
SUDDS
JEZE
Where is your heart?
Where is your courage?
This is one of your own – YOU LET him twist in the WIND?
How can I, with NO KNOWLEDGE / PROOF – go out on a LIMB?
And you people blast me for NUTTINESS?
At least I have B…S.
At least I tell the truth.
And I stand behind what I write – until I believe I am wrong.
Then I correct ….
Deadline for Stratford Star is Monday noon.
If all of you bloggers signed a 250 word letter of support,
with many of stratford’s finest also signing – would or would
NOT the CT POST and STAR LOVE to PRINT IT.
So far – you people are all talk / all writing / an no competent
attempt at Public expose!
I am pretty sure Joe McNeil knows what goes in this blog.
Here is a guy who steps up for others.
The others are quivering cowards who do not deserve a guy like
him – or me – or Ed Hargus – or Diane Buda – or Marcia Stewart.
However we are dumb enough to TRY to help our brothers and
our SISTERS … And YOU?
George,
“He would not provide me with documented proof about his situation – so I could NOT go on a limb on something I could not prove.”
Joe McNeil is a named defendant in a civil lawsuit (Christian Miron’s “defamation” suit) and a criminal charge. He is also a career ;aw enforcement officer. His documented proof has a place in a court proceeding, not a blog.
In any event, what kind of documentation can you provide to prove something you didn’t do? I didn’t make 4 copies of my tax bill…how do I prove that?
Backwards:
In any event, what kind of documentation can you provide
to prove something you didn’t do?
-
That was my task in my lawsuit vs. Mossman.
ZERO witnesses would support Mossman in the criminal charge of
disorderly conduct.
I had newspaper articles about the Dec 13, 1998 Town Council
Meeting which was RAUCUS – yet none mentioned me.
Had anyone stepped forward to lie – I had foundation to call the
newspaper reporters who would have said – they saw and heard
that something briefly happened and was over – NOT WORTHY of
the INVESTIGATING – REPORTING.
In my Civil suit, those were my foundations to call reporters as
witnesses. However, Berchem’s fellow Fairfield Univ alumni Joe
Merly’s nephew snuck on to my law firm and I had to try to go
PRO SE.
I had MOSSMAN’S POLICE REPORT which was filled with unproveable
LIES and EASY for any honest witness to refute.
I was allowed ZERO WITNESSES
They had BARNHART – LoSCIAVO w DICK MIRON + TONY SCHIRILLO in
the WINGS. The person who took / tape recorded my call to Police
about Mossman? DiLIETO.
Only DICK MIRON has yet to be richly compensated, unless ….
Schirillo makes extra $ 30,000 year as Stratford Liaison to Father
Land … ooopss .. Home Land Security.
Besides his State Trooper SWAG.
Barnhart makes $ 100,000 in Fairfield Economic Development – his
aceptance article – he stated he knew nothing about Economic
Development, which his 10 year in Stratford proved.
DeLieto … Ask McNeil
LoSchiavo … Ask McNeil
Joe McNeil is a named defendant in a civil lawsuit
(Christian Miron’s “defamation” suit) and a criminal
charge. He is also a career ;aw enforcement officer.
His documented proof has a place in a court proceeding,
not a blog.
SO YOU ADMIT YOU WILL NOT WRITE A LETTER TO THE EDITOR
TO SUPPORT the TYPE of PERSON McNIEL IS?
AND TO PROTEST THE MIS-TREATMENT HE IS GETTING?
I WAS FIRED / SUSPENDED for 10 MONTHS the FIRST TIME from
USPS – I had 20 AFFADAVITS of SUPPORT about my conduct
and testifying against the MANAGEMENT MISCONDUCT.
The only PULL you have is for 20 police to file into a court?
You can’t even get a COUNTER INVESTIGATION or CROSS FILE?
George,
The letter has been sent to both publications.
Are you willing to give me odds on the likelihood they will be published?
QUALIFIER: Letter has to be well writen, unlike most of the
childish insults posted on Topix
If betting was legal, I would give odds the Star would publish.
I would also give odds the Post would publish, if signed by at
least 3 or 4 people, and a sure thing if signed by at least 50
of stratford’s finast and other supporters.
If signed by just one person, it all depends on the quality of
the letter, to both publications, but the star gets far fewer.
George,
You hereby have my permission to print it out and obtain 50 signatures.
George the proof that they did nothing wrong was all in the report the TAXPAYERS paid for that was written up by the chief’s BUDDIES. The report found them not guilty of any wrong doing. What is interesting is that every officer in the dept will be guilty of the crimes that McNeil and Soto are accused of. Everyone has thrown a paper in the trash that has information on it, most if not all have used the system of looking up reports with badge numbers and not just case numbers(which makes it a common procedure by the way–which is one of the circumstances listed as reasonable…). When this case is said and done the only winner will be BMD. The officers that are accused and the taxpayers are the ones getting screwed. And you and I both know that this is ALL about Miron getting revenge. In November the public is going to get revenge on him when they kick his sorry azz to the curb and spit on him. When he is out of ear shot even those closest to him say he is not fit for the job.
Send your letter in to the papers, send it to the AG, send it to the feds and keep on sending it to more than one office. Eventually someone is going to step up and do something, or maybe the taxpayers can hire their own attorney and go after this jerk-Brocovich style.
WOW
Thanks to those who invited me to facebook.
No offense = ain’t ever gonna happen.
Phin -
I agree with most of your letter.
But I believe Miron / Burturla have back door control or leverage
on every candidate, except me.
Jon shows possibilities, but it will cost his business and Donna’s job,
if he distances himself from Proto / Burturla.
Nice handsome picture, Ron – perfect quote!
No offense – I like PCS picture better.
Jeze,
When I see the letter and if you have signatures of 50 Stratford
police, there is 99 % chance I would sign it.
The devil is in the details, for that 1 %.
The Police and Public Sector KNOW what is happening.
They will be taking it on the chin, no matter who gets elected.
The difference is they can be NOBLE and do what is RIGHT,
while creating a PYRRHIC VICTORY for Miron Muppets ….
Or the can sit on their knowledge and HOPE they do NOT get
thrown under the BUS?
Diane Buda & Eleanor Burke had more between their legs and
their ears, than most men in Stratford.
Had those 3 Referendums been followed to the Letter and Spirit
of the LAW – would Mirons / Burturlas / B UTTER NUTS – have
NOTHING with which to BUY POLITICAL and WORKER / CONTRACTOR
FRIENDS?
If those people who KNOW the TRUTH about the TOWN CHARTER
speak up before the ELECTION ….
At least FOUNDATION would be LAID for R.I.C.O. ACT.
CLASS ACTION
CIVIL
CRIMINAL
Privatized CRIMINAL under the 9th AMENDMENT.
Unlike ROCKY, I can NOT win in the RING.
But I can FIGURATIVELY bust up their ribs, and bloody their nose.
When the REAL CHALLENGER STEPS UP to the RING – they will have
KNOWLEDGE of Weakness and Foundation for REASONABLE PERSONS
to FIND PROBABLE CAUSE.
There is a method to my SANITY CLAUSe.
The Stratford Star, Stratford Bard, and CT. POST are also a
PAPER TRAIL …..
Jeze,
Please find a way to save this entire blog and that of Playwrite
- out side YOUR COMPUTER!
Everyone in Stratford knows a PIECE of the PUZZLE.
Burturla / Miron / B UTTERNUTS know more than most.
But there would be no hesitation for them to be thrown
under the BUS, with the right “situation.”
George,
“Jeze,
When I see the letter and if you have signatures of 50 Stratford
police, there is 99 % chance I would sign it.
The devil is in the details, for that 1 %.”
Gee, thanks for the effort. So I get to write a letter, walk it around and get 50 signatures and then, maybe, you’ll sign it too?
If I recall, it was YOU who insisted it be published. Thanks for the input, ole buddy.
I wonder how some people can take OATHS of OFFICE
WEAR the FLAG
LEARN the LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS
PLEDGE to protect and serve the INNOCENT
and then be so, so, so schizophrenic
in essentially becoming LIARS and THIEVES?
And worse.
LAWYERS ACTUALLY LEARN and UNDERSTAND they way things
are supposed to be, including in their BAR CODE of CONDUCT.
Then become BLIND to their CONDUCT being egregariously
pernicious, hypocritical, and harmful to people, who they
appear to be completely desensitized to their cruelty and
lack of humanity …..
Dick Burturla, Dick Miron, Tony Schirillo, Norm, and Louie
actually consider themselves good guys.
But then so do Dick Cheney and W, who, like Hitler had supporters.