Tarnishing the Badge
Before we begin this sordid & corrupt little tale, some background information should be provided. At the time, we felt this would be handled appropriately and did not spend much webspace on it. How wrong we were. This is Stratford after all and “business as usual” has a different meaning here. But to begin;
No arrests planned in Stratford cop, resident clash
Brittany Lyte, Staff Writer
Updated 10:39 p.m., Wednesday, July 6, 2011
STRATFORD — The Police Department will make no arrests following the criminal investigation of an officer accused of assaulting a town resident.
Detective William Jennings, a veteran officer with 23 years on the force, was accused of assault April 18 by David Fredericks, a 39-year-old landscaping business owner, during a dispute outside Fredericks’ home on Chapel Street about 7 p.m.
Fredericks and three witnesses — his wife, one of his employees and the sister of another employee — told police Jennings refused to identify himself when he approached Fredericks on his property in plainclothes in April and demanded that Fredericks pay up money he said he owed his friend to replace a damaged tree. Jennings was screaming, swearing and threatening to “ruin” him, according to Fredericks.
Fredericks said he did not recognize Jennings and did not know anything about the debt Jennings was trying to collect from him.
Fredericks said Jennings pushed him. He said he became upset and scared, so he threatened to get a baseball bat if the stranger did not leave. Fredericks never got the bat, but called 911.
Fredericks is heard screaming and swearing repeatedly at Jennings to leave his property during several 911 calls he made at the scene during the dispute.
Fredericks’ wife, June Palatiello, said she was eating dinner when a man she did not recognize drove a silver Lexus into their driveway. She ran outside to assist her husband when she realized he did not know the man and the stranger seemed to be refusing to leave.
Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/No-arrests-planned-in-Stratford-cop-resident-1455295.php#ixzz1flQdzrc7
Let’s stop there. Silver Lexus? You mean the Lexus that was stolen from Fairfield Lexus? It seems the Stratford Police Department stole that Lexus. From what we can piece together from several authoritative sources
1. The Lexus was reported stolen from Lexus of Fairfield.
2. Detective Bill Jennings working for the DEA (see above article) took possession of the car.
3. Jennings was stopped at least at least once by other law enforcement departments and it came back as reported stolen.
4. Lt. Pinto (Jennings’ supervisor)contacted dispatch and told them to send a locate on the car to Fairfield PD stating that Stratford had the car and to cancel the stolen vehicle report.
5. No notification to the insurance company was made that the Lexus had been recovered nor was it mentioned to Lexus of Fairfield.
6. Lt. Pinto claims that it was a “problem” in Wethersfield as to why the car was still reported stolen
7. Lt Pinto then registers the vehicle under a police method for undercover vehicles.
8. The insurance company pays the owner of the car.
9. Stratford PD is still in possession of the Lexus. The insurance company may be getting a little suspicious by now.
10.Jennings succumbs to an undefined illness after the article is published and has been out on sick leave since.
To the civilian observers (like us) this appears to be a case of insurance fraud at a minimum and grand theft and falsification of records plus a host of other charges at the other end. We certainly do not expect that police officers are in the business of stealing luxury cars for their on and off duty use.
Which begs the question: Who is in charge at the PD?
One answer is obvious: Lock your car doors.
Filed under: Stratford Political Theater | 72 Comments
Tags: Jennings, Pinto

CHECK YOUR EMAIL
WTF????
Mike,
“WTF????”
George is probably referring to my email which now contains page after page after page of a variety of conspiracy theories. Thank you so much, George.
If you’re referring to the article above, yes indeed. WTF???? It really makes you wonder what else has been going on.
lol…I’m referring to the above article.
Mike,
So has your pride been restored?
Somewhat yes. We aren’t embroiled in controversy after controversy that makes us a laughing stock of the state. Do we have problems, of course…show me a town that doesn’t. They seem worse to us because we live here and pay for it.
Mike,
“Somewhat yes.”
Admittedly we no longer have a bullying buffoon in the mayor’s office, we still do not have the accountability and competence we pay dearly for.
Wow, a stolen car? Insurance fraud? Doesnt a stolen car have to do with NCIC/COLLECT, I believe it does, is the State Police Major Crime Investigating this since they oversee NCIC/COLLECT use….
2011 – 23 = 1988 or maybe 1987?
Who happened to be Town Council Chairman 1987-1989?
Does that ex-chair have any influence with CT State Police, due to
1 – a former head of CT State Trooper Home Land Security?
2 – a former Stratford DTC Chairman & CT State Trooper?
3 – a former CT State Trooper & RTC Member & bro-in-law
to a former ranking Stratford Police?
Some times a conspiracy exists?
Some times a cigar is just a cigar?
I prefer to believe people innocent until proven guilty.
It does appear Stratford police recovered a stolen car.
I have ZERO knowledge of a chain of custody or circumstances.
Bollicks,
“State Police Major Crime Investigating this since they oversee NCIC/COLLECT use”
Don’t be silly. It’s not like the Lexus was parked illegally, you know.
But now its past practice, Why arent they involved, Stratford picks and chooses their investigations….Oh Wait, Buturla is out in Virginia now…
Bollicks,
“But now its past practice,”
That means that the mayor would have to pick an innocent Captain and Lieutenant and have them demoted, suspended without pay and arrested.
Guilty Captains and Lieutenants never get punished. This case should prove that again.
http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/033103.AHN.Murvin.pdf
I found this case very interesting above, Murvin vs Stratford, does anyone know how much this cost Stratford?
Bollicks,
I recognized a name or two in the case. Pretty much the same ones as in the article above.
“does anyone know how much this cost Stratford?”
More than a brand new Lexus?
Bingo Jez.
I see Malloy wants to arrest for food, this is a stolen car, right….
Any Tomb stones missing?
Any pile of unpaid printed material?
Any falsified reports? deJa vu?
Before any more is added, which it no doubt will be, we would like to make clear that the Stratford PD has, is and will continue to be comprised of some of the finest women and men we will ever have the privilege to know.
Incidents and abuses like this tend to destroy morale and remove incentive on an almost daily basis. It cannot be tolerated by the community nor the department. That is why you find the article here. These acts of corruption cannot be left hidden. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.
Therefore, we call upon Mayor Harkins who has the sole power to remedy this corruption to actually do something.
There are many, many, decent and honorable police within the
rank and file. However there are a few who are politically malleable
and willing to delete items, leave out items, and change items in
the police reports (I have 3 instances) as well as not conduct full,
intensive and unbiased investigations.
This is NOT just in Stratford, but also to state police & FBI.
POLITICIZATION exists in many departments and agencies
in a wide range of areas including elected, appointed, hired
promted, and contracted
George,
“This is NOT just in Stratford, but also to state police & FBI.”
Nonetheless, our PD deserves to be free of this type of abuse. Not to mention we citizens as well.
Frank Piccolo
Gary Owen
Phyrric Victory
The only thing worse is if one of these corrupt individuals filed a lawsuit against the Town claiming something like age discrimination as the reason for a dismissal.
Oh! Wait a minute…..
Drum roll …………………….. please ……………
George,
“Drum roll ”
Based on the article you have a 50/50 chance of being right.
Ahhhhh!
Now I gottcha, Jeze,
Which 50 % chance?
George,
“Which 50 % chance?”
Really? As our resident conspiracy expert, you can’t work this one out?
Really? As our resident conspiracy expert,
you can’t work this one out?
I seem to be better at identifying the inscrutables,
than the scrupulous.
Sorry about giving you a compliment.
I like keeping you off balance.
I like dealing with give & take …
rather than the take & take …
PORTIA and the RepubiCAN’Ts are INCAPABLE of distancing
themselves from the CRASSUS, CAESAR, & CICERO COMPLEX.
George,
Given Portia’s wish to deregulate everything imaginable, I can only surmise that Portia would have difficulty seeing the need for police officers in the first place.
It feels nice to be missed by George and Jez, who have taken to attributing to me beliefs contrary to my own if only to “encourage” a reply. They know I can’t resist setting the record straight.
So, to George, can you elaborate on this “Complex”? Grouping those three very different Romans together is idiosyncratic bordering on incoherent. As for the “can’t” or “Party of No” meme, would you prefer a “yes” to the unprecedented illegality, incompetence, and corruption of President Obama?
Should we meekly reply “yes, Mr President” when, as he did last night on 60 Minutes, Obama said “Steve, the math is the math. You can’t lower rates and raise revenue, unless you’re getting revenue from someplace else”? Does it bear mentioning that had Bush uttered something so incredibly foolish — of course, lower rates + more payers = increased revenue — we would all be having a good laugh at his expense by now?
How about President Obama’s idea to “save” Social Security by further reducing already inadequate revenues (the temporary payroll tax holiday)? Where, or where, are the scaremongers (AARP, Committee to Enslave
Future Generations, sorry, to Protect Social Security and Medicare) of the entitlement state when you need them?
I did like the Osawatomie speech because it means that Obama supporters can no longer claim to be in Kansas anymore. Caracas or Havana, but not Kansas.
As David Harasanyi has it, “Obama dropped almost all pretenses and made the progressive case against an American free market system, which he called “a simple theory … one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. … And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work.”
Obama, after all, is such a towering economic mind that in Osawatomie, he once again blamed ATMs (and the Internets) for job losses. This is a man we can trust. “Less productivity! More jobs!”
That‘s not to say capital isn’t useful occasionally, of course. Not long ago, Obama hosted a $38,000-a-plate fundraiser for wealthy Manhattanites. The president — with the Democratic National Committee — has hauled in more cash from rent-seeking financial-sector companies than all Republican candidates combined. This president has supported every big-business bailout with taxpayers’ money, even though he claims they shouldn’t be on the “hook for Wall Street’s mistakes (http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2011/12/06/obama-vs-capitalism/).””
Now, Jez, “deregulate everything imaginable”? We’ve already made clear that I favor consumer sovereignty, the strongest regulation possible. We have also established that you are unwilling to take on the (impossible) task of defending corrupt and incompetent government regulation — you know, the kind that makes millions of Americans sick every year when they unsuspectingly buy contaminated USDA inspected and certified meats. Your only response is to say the regulators need more money and more power. I’ve dealt with that canard, too. The fact is we have never had a more powerful, large, and expensive national government than now. How is that working out for you?
To your specific charge: I fully support and appreciate our Finest, the honest and hard-working police who daily defend the rule of law, a lawful purpose of government (dust off your federal and state constitution’s once in a while?) It is a shame that their ranks are occasionally sullied by bad actors as well as that they are forced to belong to monopolistic unions that do not represent officers’ best interests.
Portia,
Glad to see nothing has changed.
Consistency is the cornerstone of excellence.
Mike,
You like the bar set on “LOW”, don’t you?
“Consistency is the cornerstone of excellence.”
Jeze – What if the cornerstone is set over quicksand?
- Portia >
Crassus was a monied Patrician & allied to Caesar
Caesar was a Crass, Cold, and Calculating Soldier / Politician
/ Master tactician.
Cicero was a master orator & writer, defender of Murder.
-
Portia, you know I am not an apologist for neither the Demon-crats
nor RepubliCAN’Ts.
Obama Chief of staff is the son of the Mayor of Chicago during
the Convention, during the Nixon time.
Newt was the regional head for Nelson Rockefeller.
Obama people are hip deep in CFA & TRILATERALISM like the
Bush – Cheney gangsters, Clinton – Gore, GHWB, Reagan black
hearts of the WHITE HOUSE.
The CHURCH COMMITTEE identified the true enemies of humanity.
So, to George, can you elaborate on this “Complex”?
Grouping those three very different Romans together is
idiosyncratic bordering on incoherent.
Nice vocabulary, yet erronious, per usual.
Reference “Death of a Republic” – Dickenson
Death of a republic
politics and political thought at Rome 59-44 B.C
edited by George Lee Haskins.
Published 1963 by Macmillan, Collier-Macmillan in New York .
Written in English.
ID Numbers – Open Library OL19014416M
Death of a republic : politics and political thought at Rome
59-44 B.C. / John Dickinson ; edited and with an introduction
by George Lee Haskins
Marcus Licinius Crassus (Latin: M·LICINIVS·P·F·P·N·CRASSVS)
(ca. 115 BC – 53 BC) was a Roman general and politician who
commanded the right wing of
Crassus grew up as the son of a consul and distinguished general.
His career to fame and phenomenal wealth began as he started
purchasing the houses of …
Crassus saw Pompey as his great rival, but knew he could not
match Pompey’s military achievements. So, he set about winning
popularity by acting as an …
—
Gaius Julius Caesar (July 100 BC – 15 March 44 BC) was a
Roman general and statesman and a distinguished writer of
Latin prose. He played a critical role in …
—
Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman philosopher, statesman, lawyer, political theorist, and Roman constitutionalist. He came from a wealthy municipal family of
January 3, 106 BC – December 7, 43 BC; sometimes anglicized
as Tully[1]), was a Roman philosopher, statesman, lawyer,
political theorist, and Roman constitutionalist. He came from
a wealthy municipal family of the equestrian order, and is widely
considered one of Rome’s greatest orators and prose stylists.
Exile and returnIn 60 BC Julius Caesar invited Cicero to be the
fourth member of his existing partnership with Pompey and
Marcus Licinius Crassus, an assembly that would eventually
be called the First Triumvirate.
Cicero refused the invitation because he suspected it would
undermine the Republic.
This item: Murder Trials (Penguin Classics)
by Marcus Tullius Cicero Paperback.
An accomplished poet, philosopher, rhetorician, and humorist,
Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BC-43 BC) was also the greatest
forensic orator Rome ever produced
Cicero’s speeches “In Defence of Sextus Roscius of Amerina,”
“In Defence of Aulus Cluentius Habitus,”
“In Defence of Gaius Rabirius,” “Note on the Speeches in
Defence of Caelius and Milo,” and
“In Defence of King Deiotarus” provide insight into Roman
life, law, and history.
Sorry Portia, your idiosyncratic historic and present errors in
judgin politics of notorious political actors border on incoherent
babble, by consistant misunderstanding realities from postures.
8)
Stratford is not the only place or time in history with strange
POLITICAL bedfellows.
H O R R O R S.
You know how they teach people doing public speaking to pretend
all of the audience are NAKED?
H O R R O R S !!!
While TYPING strange POLITICAL bedfellows, the thought flashed
of the country club crony capitalists NAKED with the BARRISTERS
and various TOWN COUNCILORS and BOARD of ED . . . .
Y U C K !!!
Almost as BAD as what I see in the M I R R O R ….
George/Portia,
Meanwhile, back in this century, apparently Detective Jenninngs went out on “sick” leave shortly after the strong arm incident with Fredericks. He is still out on sick leave five months later….at full pay, of course.
Something BIG may be coming, not directly related to this,
yet systemically.
Update:
Stratford cop suspended after internal investigation
Brittany Lyte, Staff Writer
Updated 11:51 p.m., Tuesday, December 20, 2011
STRATFORD — A police officer accused of assaulting a town resident received a 15-day suspension without pay after an internal investigation found he violated the law.
Detective William Jennings, a veteran officer with 23 years on the force, was accused of assault April 18 by David Fredericks, a 39-year-old landscaping business owner, during a dispute outside Fredericks’ home on Chapel Street….
…A month after his suspension was imposed, Jennings filed a complaint against the Police Department and the town of Stratford with the state Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.
In the 14-page grievance, Jennings details what he describes as a deep-seated culture of animosity among some members of the police department. He said his removal from the DEA task force and the investigation against him is retaliation for speaking out about unethical activity within the department and because he is paid at a higher rate than most other officers.
Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Stratford-cop-suspended-after-internal-2415003.php#ixzz1hAC0zEEr”
So…who gets the Lexus?
Update:
In yet the latest twist in this twisted tale, it seems that Detective Jennings has resigned. A happy ending? Don’t be silly! Detective Jennings will be collecting his pension beginning next December to a tune of well north of $61,000 (imagine the overtime he will claim and will be approved). Who will be playing that tune for Detective Jennings for the rest of his natural life? Why, you and me the taxpayers of Stratford of course.
Yet more update:
The question becomes whose signature will be on the overtime approvals for Jennings? Will it be Pinto’s or perhaps Popik’s? They are after all, his “supervisors”. The same guys who let him drive around in a stolen Lexus for months. (Say, did the insurance company ever get their money or car back?). Then we have to ask what Jennings actually did during his workshifts? How many drug arrests have been made, how many search warrants issued, how many cases have ended in convictions?
Here is a bigger problem: The Town of Stratford has 90+ police officers. Almost all of them come to work every single day to solve our problems, keep us safe and make sure we can do what we do with minimal interference. They do so with occasional risk to themselves ( it is Stratford not the South Bronx or South Central LA after all).
The antics of Jennings and the “supervisors” that should have restricted him cause harm to not only citizens and taxpayers but to the excellent officers that we have in the PD. There is not a police officer on our police department that is not embarrassed and demoralized by this case and by the “supervisors” that let it go on.
Update:
Ridenhour named Stratford police chief
Written by John Kovach
Thursday, 09 February 2012 12:26
http://stratfordstar.com/news/72044-ridenhour-named-stratford-police-chief.html
He can’t be serious.
Your objections?
Mike,
Two.
We paid CBG Strategies to “find” Ridenhour.
Did you happen to read this topic and remember who was in charge at the time?
“We paid CBG Strategies to “find” Ridenhour.”
Good work if you can get it, huh???
“Did you happen to read this topic and remember who was in charge at the time?”
Sadly, this kinda makes him the ideal choice for Stratford, no???
Yes I do recall who was in charge.
One thing I’ve learned is that police chiefs who are hired by a mayor are a reflection of that mayor.
Burturla was hired by an evil man and thus acted accordingly.
Ridenhour was now hired by someone with far more character and morals and I would expect him to act accordingly.
“One thing I’ve learned is that police chiefs who are hired by a mayor are a reflection of that mayor.”
Sooooooo… then I guess we’ll never again hear from Ridenhour unless there is a store/restaurant opening!!!
PS… I wonder who his Chief of Staff will be???
Exactly
PS… I wonder who his Chief of Staff will be???
There were 2 LoSchiavo’s hired, by P D, weren’t there?
—
Sudds:
“One thing I’ve learned is that police chiefs who are hired
by a mayor are a reflection of that mayor.”
Sooooooo… then I guess we’ll never again hear from
Ridenhour unless there is a store/restaurant opening!!!
Geo: NOW THAT’S FUNNY …
It is also SAD, because it appears TRUE.
“Me and my shadow …”
“Strolling down the avenue”
—
Mike Reynolds:
“One thing I’ve learned is that police chiefs who are
hired by a mayor are a reflection of that mayor.
Burturla was hired by an evil man and thus acted accordingly.
Ridenhour was now hired by someone with far more character
and morals and I would expect him to act accordingly.”
Geo: Personnel is policy ….
HARKINS – Police Chief 2 years = John Burturla
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Finance Dept promotion – Sue Collier
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Town Attorney Firms: Burturla + Kelly + Florek
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Public Works – McCarthy
MIRON > Same
HARKINS / BoE Attorney Firms: Burturla + Kelly + Florek
MIRON > Same
HARKINS / BoE Superintendent: Cornish
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Police Budget > OT
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Fire Budget > OT
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Fire Defined Benefit Pension
MIRON > Same
HARKINS – Police Defined Benefit Pension
MIRON > Same 1996 CUTOFF between plans – only made
official ….
Police bought & paid for – just like FBI & State PD.
Just like ranking Intelligence / Military Community
Just like Board of Ed
Just like Wall Street
Just like Congress / Senate
Just like Judicial
Just like BAR Association
Difference between Russian & Chinese Communist apparatchik
/ Nomenklura and Democrats / Republicans.
- They now practice Capitalism.
NONE practice meritocracy – all in who you know & who you bl*w
Right Mike?
Fore ….
Most of this country’s honest people need a Mulligan.
“PS… I wonder who his Chief of Staff will be???”
He would be called “Deputy Chief”.
Mike,
“Ridenhour was now hired by someone with far more character and morals”
What evidence do you have of that?
You mean its not obvious?
Mike,
“You mean its not obvious?”
Maybe I missed it. Perhaps if you cited a few examples. Or one.
I say that because I personally know him.
But one example is that he did stiff a print shop for $12,000 and refuses to pay.
Mike,
“But one example is that he did stiff a print shop for $12,000 and refuses to pay.”
Who are we talking about?
That should read, “He DIDN’T stiff a print ship for $12,000 and refuses to pay.”
That’s it? That’s your example?
Yup, you asked for one and there you go.
Well, you certainly convinced me. But I must say, your bar is set on “low”.
You asked for an example…I gave one. If you don’t like it there’s nothing I can do…that’s on you.
On me?
No…that’s on all of us.
Jez ,
I believe Mr.Ridenhour was hired Mr. Miron as well.
Ron,
Good point.
And we didn’t have to pay CBG Strategies that time!
Jezebel,
I guess it doesn’t matter who is in charge. Wasting tax payer money will continue.
George,
“There were 2 LoSchiavo’s hired, by P D, weren’t there?”
I believe there were 4 LoSchiavos hired by the PD.
I believe there were 4 LoSchiavos hired by the PD.
-
Non sequitors
1 – Name them?
2 – How many people were “3 stooges?”
Name them?
3 – How many Marx brothers”
Name them?
4 – Without looking them up what are names of 4 states
which are Common Wealths?
5 – Without looking them up what are names of 4 states
which have state capitals which begin with the same letter
of their state?
6 – How many actors played James Bond, in released movies?
Name them?
7 – What do the above have in common?
8 – Who’s on first?
9 – Third base.
I dun know ….. >